On 11/20/19 4:24 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Instead, set the initial data field directly.

(the initial data is an array of 256 bytes. As I don't know if it may
change over time, I keep the pointer to original buffer as is, but it
might be worth to consider to copy it instead)

Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
---
  hw/i2c/smbus_eeprom.c | 17 ++++++++---------
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/i2c/smbus_eeprom.c b/hw/i2c/smbus_eeprom.c
index 54c86a0112..533c728b3b 100644
--- a/hw/i2c/smbus_eeprom.c
+++ b/hw/i2c/smbus_eeprom.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
  typedef struct SMBusEEPROMDevice {
      SMBusDevice smbusdev;
      uint8_t data[SMBUS_EEPROM_SIZE];
-    void *init_data;
+    uint8_t *init_data;
      uint8_t offset;
      bool accessed;
  } SMBusEEPROMDevice;
@@ -129,14 +129,14 @@ static void smbus_eeprom_reset(DeviceState *dev)
static void smbus_eeprom_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
  {
+    SMBusEEPROMDevice *eeprom = SMBUS_EEPROM(dev);
+
      smbus_eeprom_reset(dev);
+    if (eeprom->init_data == NULL) {
+        error_setg(errp, "init_data cannot be NULL");
+    }
  }
-static Property smbus_eeprom_properties[] = {
-    DEFINE_PROP_PTR("data", SMBusEEPROMDevice, init_data),
-    DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
-};
-
  static void smbus_eeprom_class_initfn(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
  {
      DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
@@ -146,9 +146,8 @@ static void smbus_eeprom_class_initfn(ObjectClass *klass, 
void *data)
      dc->reset = smbus_eeprom_reset;
      sc->receive_byte = eeprom_receive_byte;
      sc->write_data = eeprom_write_data;
-    dc->props = smbus_eeprom_properties;
      dc->vmsd = &vmstate_smbus_eeprom;
-    /* Reason: pointer property "data" */
+    /* Reason: init_data */
      dc->user_creatable = false;
  }
@@ -172,7 +171,7 @@ void smbus_eeprom_init_one(I2CBus *smbus, uint8_t address, uint8_t *eeprom_buf) dev = qdev_create((BusState *) smbus, TYPE_SMBUS_EEPROM);
      qdev_prop_set_uint8(dev, "address", address);
-    qdev_prop_set_ptr(dev, "data", eeprom_buf);
+    SMBUS_EEPROM(dev)->init_data = eeprom_buf;

Isn't this a QOM anti-pattern?

      qdev_init_nofail(dev);
  }


Reply via email to