On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 10:14 PM Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.m.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:46 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > The following changes since commit f086f22d6c068ba151b0f6e81e75a64f130df712: > > > > Merge remote-tracking branch > > 'remotes/awilliam/tags/vfio-fixes-20191118.0' into staging (2019-11-18 > > 21:35:48 +0000) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > https://github.com/stefanha/qemu.git tags/tracing-pull-request > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 6b904f1a528a6d8c21f7fbdeab13b9603d1b6df7: > > > > hw/mips/gt64xxx: Remove dynamic field width from trace events (2019-11-19 > > 16:17:05 +0000) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Pull request > > > > Tracing fixes for MIPS. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Hello, Stefan, Philippe, Peter. > > This appears to be a duplicate of the pull request sent today by Philippe > (and already applied by Peter just hours ago): > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-11/msg02894.html > > The patches from the two pull requests appear to be identical, except > some minor details in commit messages: Stefan's versions contain > "Message-Id:" identifiers, while Philippe's don't (my suggestion to > Philippe is to include "Message-Id:" for all patches that are part of any > pull request in future; this can be achieved effortlessly/automatically > by applying patches using patchwork). > > In summary, for this very situation, it looks to me we are all set, no need > for Peter to process this pull request. >
And just another really friendly advice for Philippe: When you apply some patches or a series to your pull request, just inform others about that by replying to the patches or a series: "I applied XXX to my queue/pull request" - this helps avoiding duplicate efforts like it happened here. This is also reminder to me too, I didn't do it in all cases of my applying to my my pull requests, and I should have, but I will improve too. Thanks for these fixes! Aleksandar > Regards, > Aleksandar > > > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2): > > hw/block/pflash: Remove dynamic field width from trace events > > hw/mips/gt64xxx: Remove dynamic field width from trace events > > > > hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c | 8 ++++---- > > hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c | 8 ++++---- > > hw/block/trace-events | 8 ++++---- > > hw/mips/gt64xxx_pci.c | 16 ++++++++-------- > > hw/mips/trace-events | 4 ++-- > > 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.23.0 > > > >
