On 2019-11-15 11:35, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:42:35 +0100
Pierre Morel <pmo...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
On 2019-11-14 14:19, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:02:35 +0100
Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:38:23 +0100
Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 20:02:33 +0100
Pierre Morel <pmo...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
...snip...
We made some different design decisions, while aiming essentially for the
same. Maybe it's due to different scope, maybe not. For instance one
can't test IDA with PONG, I guess.
Now that I saw this again, I also recall the discussion of comparing it
with the "testdev" for pci/isa. Anybody knows if these are used by
kvm-unit-tests?
Only by X.
If they use it, it might make sense for s390 to use a comparable
approach.
yes it does.
Btw, I created https://wiki.qemu.org/Testing/CCWTestDevice back then;
might make sense to collect ideas there?
right, I forgot this too.
OK, will use it :)
Regards,
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
