----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Blake" <ebl...@redhat.com>
> To: "Cleber Rosa" <cr...@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>, "Eduardo Habkost"
> <ehabk...@redhat.com>, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé"
> <f4...@amsat.org>, "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <waine...@redhat.com>,
> "Laurent Vivier" <laur...@vivier.eu>,
> "Willian Rampazzo" <wramp...@redhat.com>, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé"
> <phi...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 10:43:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Acceptance test: update kernel used on m68k/q800 test
>
> On 10/29/19 6:23 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > The boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_m68k_q800 was very
> > recently merged, but between its last review and now, the Kernel
> > package used went missing.
> >
>
> meta-question: Why was this series posted in-reply-to the pull request,
> rather than as a new top-level thread? I nearly missed it because I
> don't expect to see unreviewed patches buried in threading like that.
> My workflow would have been to post the series in isolation, then
> manually reply to the pull request to mention the message-id of the
> related series proposed as a followup.
>
Hi Eric,
That was my attempt to signal that it was a fix to something which had *just*
being merged as part of that pull request (though now caused by it).
I basically did not know how to act properly, so I thank you for the workflow
suggestion. I'll certainly follow it next time.
Thanks a lot!
- Cleber.
> --
> Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
> Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
>
