Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes:
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 10:36, Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: >> At what point do we declare that NetBSD CI is broken and is no longer >> considered a supported platform from POV of blocking the merging of >> PULL requests ? It has been preventing the dropping of python2 for >> quite a while now. It isn't the end of the world in this particular >> case, as dropping py2 is mostly just a cleanup, but I feel like we >> might benefit from setting expectations for ongoing platform maintenance, >> otherwise these kind of issues could drag on indefinitely. > > It works fine for me, and it means we have coverage of a host > OS we otherwise would not. To me that is definitely more important > than being able to drop Python 2 support. Also, AIUI the problem > that's blocking updating the NetBSD image isn't related to > NetBSD at all but is a bug in some combination of QEMU itself > and our test framework These have been addressed in: Subject: [PATCH v1 0/6] testing/next (netbsd stuff) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 17:36:48 +0000 Message-Id: <20191104173654.30125-1-alex.ben...@linaro.org> but I have a non-trivial failure rate running tests (~20% of runs fail) > -- both of those are things we need to > fix anyway. > > thanks > -- PMM -- Alex Bennée
