On 22.10.19 15:53, Andrey Shinkevich wrote: [...]
> If the support of COW for compressed writes is found feasible, will it > make a sense to implement? Then this series will follow. Hm, what exactly do you mean by support of COW for compressed writes? > A comment for the option would warn a user that guest writing will work > slower for if compress selected. I’m not sure whether that’s necessary. As a user, I would assume that enabling compression will always make something slower. Max
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
