Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> writes:
> On 22/10/2019 09.21, Thomas Huth wrote: >> As discussed here: >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg00697.html >> >> and here: >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg01388.html >> >> it would be good to have some more valuable iotests enabled in the >> "auto" group to get better iotest coverage during "make check". >> >> And once Max' "iotests: Add and use $SOCK_DIR" patch series has been >> merged, we can indeed enable these Python-based tests, too. > > Oh well, some Travis jobs are now running too long and hit the 50 > minutes limit: > > https://travis-ci.com/huth/qemu/jobs/248158477 > > ... so we either might need to remove some other iotests from the "auto" > group again, or change the Travis jobs to include less targets... > > That "clang + sanitizer" job was already running 45 minutes before my > change, so it was already close to the limit. So I'd suggest to change > it to include less targets. Opinions? Which one is clang with sanitizers? I think we only build softmmu for gcc + sanitizer at the moment. > > Thomas -- Alex Bennée
