Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> writes:

> On 22/10/2019 09.21, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> As discussed here:
>>
>>  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg00697.html
>>
>> and here:
>>
>>  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg01388.html
>>
>> it would be good to have some more valuable iotests enabled in the
>> "auto" group to get better iotest coverage during "make check".
>>
>> And once Max' "iotests: Add and use $SOCK_DIR" patch series has been
>> merged, we can indeed enable these Python-based tests, too.
>
> Oh well, some Travis jobs are now running too long and hit the 50
> minutes limit:
>
>  https://travis-ci.com/huth/qemu/jobs/248158477
>
> ... so we either might need to remove some other iotests from the "auto"
> group again, or change the Travis jobs to include less targets...
>
> That "clang + sanitizer" job was already running 45 minutes before my
> change, so it was already close to the limit. So I'd suggest to change
> it to include less targets. Opinions?

Which one is clang with sanitizers? I think we only build softmmu for
gcc + sanitizer at the moment.

>
>  Thomas


--
Alex Bennée

Reply via email to