On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:05:47PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:02:09PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 03:40:41PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> >On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:47:46PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 08:37:38AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >> >> >When we iterate the memory-device list to get the available range, it is >> >> >not >> >> >necessary to iterate the whole list. >> >> > >> >> >1) no more overlap for hinted range if tmp exceed it >> >> > >> >> >v2: >> >> > * remove #2 as suggested by Igor and David >> >> > * add some comment to inform address assignment stay the same as >> >> > before >> >> > this change >> >> > >> >> >Wei Yang (2): >> >> > memory-device: not necessary to use goto for the last check >> >> > memory-device: break the loop if tmp exceed the hinted range >> >> > >> >> > hw/mem/memory-device.c | 3 ++- >> >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> > >> >> >> >> Would someone take this patch set? >> > >> >yes looks good to me too. >> >Eduardo? >> > >> >> Hmm... I don't see this any where. May I ask the status? > >Sorry, I hadn't seen Michael's message. Queued on machine-next. >Thanks! >
Thanks~ have a nice day. >-- >Eduardo -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
