On 2011-05-23 11:28, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> writes: > >> Include the client type name into the output of 'info network'. The >> result looks like this: >> >> (qemu) info network >> VLAN 0 devices: >> rtl8139.0: type=nic,model=rtl8139,macaddr=52:54:00:12:34:57 >> Devices not on any VLAN: >> virtio-net-pci.0: type=nic,model=virtio-net-pci,macaddr=52:54:00:12:34:56 >> \ network1: type=tap,fd=5 >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> >> --- >> >> Changes in v2: >> - format type as "type=name" >> - use standard type names >> - factor out print_net_client >> >> net.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/net.c b/net.c >> index 606ce70..6d06eb7 100644 >> --- a/net.c >> +++ b/net.c >> @@ -1221,6 +1221,22 @@ int do_netdev_del(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict, >> QObject **ret_data) >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static void print_net_client(Monitor *mon, VLANClientState *vc) >> +{ >> + static const char *typename[] = { >> + [NET_CLIENT_TYPE_NONE] = "none", >> + [NET_CLIENT_TYPE_NIC] = "nic", >> + [NET_CLIENT_TYPE_SLIRP] = "user", >> + [NET_CLIENT_TYPE_TAP] = "tap", >> + [NET_CLIENT_TYPE_SOCKET] = "socket", >> + [NET_CLIENT_TYPE_VDE] = "vde", >> + [NET_CLIENT_TYPE_DUMP] = "dump", >> + }; >> + >> + monitor_printf(mon, "%s: type=%s,%s\n", vc->name, >> + typename[vc->info->type], vc->info_str); >> +} > > Any particular reason for using typename[vc->info->type] instead of > net_client[types[vc->info->type].type?
Uncertainty about the sorting of that array. Is it supposed to be aligned to NET_CLIENT_TYPE_* definitions? Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux