On 10/4/19 10:40 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > So we should probably cause that to happen in the new scheme > (conceptually, something like "the trigger callback is > implicitly considered to be called from within a tx begin/ > commit block, so (a) it doesn't need to do begin/commit itself > and (b) if it does something resulting in a repeat trigger > the second call will happen after it returns, not recursively" ?)
That sounds plausible. r~
