On 9/15/19 11:39 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Hi Laurent, > > Few patches I'v been writting while trying to figure out this issue: > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-arm/2018-01/msg00514.html > > As usual with linux-user files, this series will trigger some checkpatch > benign warnings. > > Regards, > > Phil. > > Since v6: > - Use ABI types in sockaddr > > Since v5: > - dropped 'Verify recvfrom(addr)' since failing LTP testsuite (see [1]) > - also define print_sockfd() for bind() (patches #6 and #7) > > Since v4: > - rebased on master (no change) > > Since v3: > - addressed Laurent comments > - added print_sockfd() > - removed the print_sockaddr_ptr() patch, also the two > getsockname()/recvfrom() patches for after 3.0. > > Since v2: > - display invalid pointer in print_timeval() and print_timezone() > - do not display gettimeofday() arguments > > Since v1: > - addressed Laurent comments > - added 'last' argument to print_sockaddr() > - reordered series, so patches already correct can get applied directly > - dropped "linux-user/syscall: simplify recvfrom()" for now > > v1: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-01/msg05855.html > v2: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-06/msg08216.html > v3: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-07/msg00411.html > v5: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-10/msg02067.html > v6: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-09/msg01346.html > [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-10/msg02807.html
Ping?
