`vsl` appears to be acting incorrectly as well, per the test
'vec_bcdsr':
=> 0x100006e0 <vec_slq+132>: vsl v0,v0,v1
(gdb) p $vr0.uint128
$21 = 0x10111213141516172021222324252650
(gdb) p $vr1.uint128
$22 = 0x0
(gdb) stepi
0x00000000100006e4 in vec_slq ()
1: x/i $pc each byte
=> 0x100006e4 <vec_slq+136>: xxlor vs0,vs32,vs32
(gdb) p $vr0.uint128
$23 = 0x10111213141516572021222324252650
=> 0x100006e0 <vec_slq+132>: vsl v0,v0,v1
(gdb) p $vr0.uint128
$21 = 0x10111213141516172021222324252650
(gdb) p $vr1.uint128
$22 = 0x0
(gdb) stepi
0x00000000100006e4 in vec_slq ()
1: x/i $pc
=> 0x100006e4 <vec_slq+136>: xxlor vs0,vs32,vs32
(gdb) p $vr0.uint128
$23 = 0x10111213141516172021222324252650
Note in the final result differs in the first nybble of the 8th MSB
('57' vs '17').
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841990
Title:
instruction 'denbcdq' misbehaving
Status in QEMU:
New
Bug description:
Instruction 'denbcdq' appears to have no effect. Test case attached.
On ppc64le native:
--
gcc -g -O -mcpu=power9 bcdcfsq.c test-denbcdq.c -o test-denbcdq
$ ./test-denbcdq
0x00000000000000000000000000000000
0x0000000000000000000000000000000c
0x22080000000000000000000000000000
$ ./test-denbcdq 1
0x00000000000000000000000000000001
0x0000000000000000000000000000001c
0x22080000000000000000000000000001
$ ./test-denbcdq $(seq 0 99)
0x00000000000000000000000000000064
0x0000000000000000000000000000100c
0x22080000000000000000000000000080
--
With "qemu-ppc64le -cpu power9"
--
$ qemu-ppc64le -cpu power9 -L [...] ./test-denbcdq
0x00000000000000000000000000000000
0x0000000000000000000000000000000c
0x0000000000000000000000000000000c
$ qemu-ppc64le -cpu power9 -L [...] ./test-denbcdq 1
0x00000000000000000000000000000001
0x0000000000000000000000000000001c
0x0000000000000000000000000000001c
$ qemu-ppc64le -cpu power9 -L [...] ./test-denbcdq $(seq 100)
0x00000000000000000000000000000064
0x0000000000000000000000000000100c
0x0000000000000000000000000000100c
--
I started looking at the code, but I got confused rather quickly.
Could be related to endianness? I think denbcdq arrived on the scene
before little-endian was a big deal. Maybe something to do with
utilizing implicit floating-point register pairs... I don't think the
right data is getting to helper_denbcdq, which would point back to the
gen_fprp_ptr uses in dfp-impl.inc.c (GEN_DFP_T_FPR_I32_Rc). (Maybe?)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1841990/+subscriptions
