On 9/11/19 11:00 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> block/dirty-bitmap.c seems to be more appropriate for it and
> bdrv_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap already in it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com>

No disagreements here. I think we put it in block.c initially because
it's a bdrv callback/dispatch function, but dirty-block.c is just a
logical subdivision of block.c, so it's fine.

Reviewed-by: John Snow <js...@redhat.com>

Reply via email to