On 27/08/2019 18:59, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkev...@virtuozzo.com> writes:
>
>> On 13/08/2019 15:21, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>
>>> Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkev...@virtuozzo.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> PINGING...
>>>
>>> Sorry about the delay. I did attempt see if the existing code threw up
>>> any errors when built with clang's undefined sanitizer. I think this is
>>> because xPtr->exp will only get read if none of the xPtr->isFOO returns
>>> false. In all those cases xPtr->exp is set.
>>>
>>> What pointed you towards this missing initialisations?
>>>
>>
>> I am sorry about missing the message. It appeared in other email thread
>> where I didn't expect. So, I missed the response.
>> When I ran the fp-tests under the Valgrind, I got lots of reports about
>> using uninitialized memory. They all disappeared after applying this
>> patch. I concluded that there are paths that use xPtr->exp uninitialized.
>>
>> $ /usr/bin/valgrind --leak-check=no --trace-children=yes
>> --keep-stacktraces=alloc-and-free --track-origins=yes
>> --log-file=myqemu-%p.log make check-softfloat
>
> It would be useful to know what tests are being run (V=1 will show you).
> I can't replicate the failure with:
>
> valgrind --leak-check=no --trace-children=yes
> --keep-stacktraces=alloc-and-free --track-origins=yes ./fp-test -s -l 2 -r
> all f16_to_f32 f16_to_f64 f16_to_f128 f32_to_f16 f32_to_f64
>
They are
./fp-test -s -l 1 -r all f16_roundToInt f32_roundToInt f64_roundToInt
f128_roundToInt
./fp-test -s -l 1 -r all f16_eq f32_eq f64_eq extF80_eq f128_eq
./fp-test -s -l 1 -r all f16_eq_signaling f32_eq_signaling
f64_eq_signaling extF80_eq_signaling f128_eq_signaling
./fp-test -s -l 1 -r all f16_add f32_add f64_add extF80_add f128_add
./fp-test -s -l 1 -r all f16_sub f32_sub f64_sub extF80_sub f128_sub
Andrey
>>
>> ==720268== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
>> ==720268== at 0x112C72: floatXRoundToInt (slowfloat.c:1371)
>> ==720268== by 0x115920: slow_f16_roundToInt (slowfloat.c:2408)
>> ==720268== by 0x133A87: test_az_f16_rx (test_az_f16_rx.c:73)
>> ==720268== by 0x10E635: do_testfloat (fp-test.c:304)
>> ==720268== by 0x10FD02: run_test (fp-test.c:1003)
>> ==720268== by 0x10FDA4: main (fp-test.c:1017)
>> ==720268== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
>> ==720268== at 0x1158D3: slow_f16_roundToInt (slowfloat.c:2404)
>>
>> ==720311== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
>> ==720311== at 0x112E54: floatXAdd (slowfloat.c:1411)
>> ==720311== by 0x115A2D: slow_f16_sub (slowfloat.c:2431)
>> ==720311== by 0x133CEC: test_abz_f16 (test_abz_f16.c:70)
>> ==720311== by 0x10E6D5: do_testfloat (fp-test.c:326)
>> ==720311== by 0x10FD02: run_test (fp-test.c:1003)
>> ==720311== by 0x10FDA4: main (fp-test.c:1017)
>> ==720311== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
>> ==720311== at 0x1159C0: slow_f16_sub (slowfloat.c:2425)
>>
>> ==720273== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
>> ==720273== at 0x113D54: floatXEq (slowfloat.c:1661)
>> ==720273== by 0x115EAD: slow_f16_eq_signaling (slowfloat.c:2538)
>> ==720273== by 0x1341D3: test_ab_f16_z_bool (test_ab_f16_z_bool.c:71)
>> ==720273== by 0x10E7DE: do_testfloat (fp-test.c:358)
>> ==720273== by 0x10FD02: run_test (fp-test.c:1003)
>> ==720273== by 0x10FDA4: main (fp-test.c:1017)
>> ==720273== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
>> ==720273== at 0x115E38: slow_f16_eq_signaling (slowfloat.c:2530)
>>
>> Even if Valgrind is wrong, the purpose of the patch is to reduce the
>> number of error reports from the Valgrind to locate other memory serious
>> issues, if any.
>>
>> Andrey
>>
>>>>
>>>> On 30/07/2019 13:13, Andrey Shinkevich wrote:
>>>>> Not all the paths in the functions, such as f16ToFloatX(), initialize
>>>>> the member 'exp' of the structure floatX.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkev...@virtuozzo.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> source/slowfloat.c | 4 ++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/tests/fp/berkeley-testfloat-3/source/slowfloat.c
>>>>> b/tests/fp/berkeley-testfloat-3/source/slowfloat.c
>>>>> index 4e84656..6e0f0a6 100644
>>>>> --- a/tests/fp/berkeley-testfloat-3/source/slowfloat.c
>>>>> +++ b/tests/fp/berkeley-testfloat-3/source/slowfloat.c
>>>>> @@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ static void f16ToFloatX( float16_t a, struct floatX
>>>>> *xPtr )
>>>>> xPtr->isInf = false;
>>>>> xPtr->isZero = false;
>>>>> xPtr->sign = ((uiA & 0x8000) != 0);
>>>>> + xPtr->exp = 0;
>>>>> exp = uiA>>10 & 0x1F;
>>>>> sig64 = uiA & 0x03FF;
>>>>> sig64 <<= 45;
>>>>> @@ -759,6 +760,7 @@ static void f32ToFloatX( float32_t a, struct floatX
>>>>> *xPtr )
>>>>> xPtr->isInf = false;
>>>>> xPtr->isZero = false;
>>>>> xPtr->sign = ((uiA & 0x80000000) != 0);
>>>>> + xPtr->exp = 0;
>>>>> exp = uiA>>23 & 0xFF;
>>>>> sig64 = uiA & 0x007FFFFF;
>>>>> sig64 <<= 32;
>>>>> @@ -895,6 +897,7 @@ static void f64ToFloatX( float64_t a, struct floatX
>>>>> *xPtr )
>>>>> xPtr->isInf = false;
>>>>> xPtr->isZero = false;
>>>>> xPtr->sign = ((uiA & UINT64_C( 0x8000000000000000 )) != 0);
>>>>> + xPtr->exp = 0;
>>>>> exp = uiA>>52 & 0x7FF;
>>>>> sig64 = uiA & UINT64_C( 0x000FFFFFFFFFFFFF );
>>>>> if ( exp == 0x7FF ) {
>>>>> @@ -1220,6 +1223,7 @@ static void f128MToFloatX( const float128_t *aPtr,
>>>>> struct floatX *xPtr )
>>>>> xPtr->isZero = false;
>>>>> uiA64 = uiAPtr->v64;
>>>>> xPtr->sign = ((uiA64 & UINT64_C( 0x8000000000000000 )) != 0);
>>>>> + xPtr->exp = 0;
>>>>> exp = uiA64>>48 & 0x7FFF;
>>>>> sig.v64 = uiA64 & UINT64_C( 0x0000FFFFFFFFFFFF );
>>>>> sig.v0 = uiAPtr->v0;
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alex Bennée
>>>
>
>
> --
> Alex Bennée
>
--
With the best regards,
Andrey Shinkevich
