On 22/08/19 18:31, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: >> With both these points in mind, I think it is pretty hard sell to >> say we should write & maintain a custom CI system just for QEMU >> unless it is offering major compelling functionality we can't do >> without.
In theory I agree. In practice, the major compelling functionality is portability. If it is true that setting up runners is problematic even on aarch64, frankly GitLab CI is dead on arrival. If it is not true, then I'd be very happy to use GitLab CI too. Paolo > I'd agree; and I'd also find it useful to have runners setup for > Gitlab CI for related things (it would be useful for the virtio-fs > stuff); if there are problems on other architectures then we should > find some go wranglers to go fix it.
