On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 07:02, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 7/16/19 9:00 AM, Joel Stanley wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 06:54, Joel Stanley <j...@jms.id.au> wrote: > >> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 12:26, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> On 04/07/19 12:13, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >>>> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 11:26:53AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > >>>>> CC'ing Stefan & Paolo for a non-ARM view on this... > >>>> > >>>> I'm not familiar with the various clock smoothing techniques implemented > >>>> in QEMU and KVM, but this looks okay given that Linux guests expect > >>>> this. > >>> > >>> Yeah, even KVM applies a minimum period of 200us to the x86 LAPIC timer. > >> > >> Can we please merge this so guests can boot on 4.1? > > > > Cédric pointed out this lacks my reviewed by. I had not provided it in > > the past as I wondered if we could come up with a better fix. However, > > I consider this a good fix for 4.1, and if sometime finds time to > > further rework the timer model in the future then we can do that work > > later. > > Agreed. > > > > > Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <j...@jms.id.au> > > Tested-by: Joel Stanley <j...@jms.id.au> > > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
HI Peter, Is this one still in your queue? Cheers, Joel
