On 8/6/19 3:00 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Renaming pc_next would be a cross-target change, so let's put that
> on the shelf for the moment. Maybe just put a TODO comment to the
> effect that we could consider renaming in future ?

I wasn't suggesting renaming the cross-target variable.

I was suggesting shuffling around the current names, and using "pc_next" for
what it sounds like -- the pc of the next insn.


r~

Reply via email to