On 8/6/19 3:00 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > Renaming pc_next would be a cross-target change, so let's put that > on the shelf for the moment. Maybe just put a TODO comment to the > effect that we could consider renaming in future ?
I wasn't suggesting renaming the cross-target variable. I was suggesting shuffling around the current names, and using "pc_next" for what it sounds like -- the pc of the next insn. r~
