On 29/07/19 11:21, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 at 09:51, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> There is no case where we're using per-.o file CFLAGS for anything other
>> than dependencies.
>
> disas/libvixl is a counterexample -- we use per-.o-file CFLAGS for:
> * suppressing warnings in third-party code we don't want to
> carry local modifications to
> * dealing with a NetBSD weirdness about header inclusion order
The NetBSD thing could be worked around with a static library but
instead those -D options could be added as global C++ flags:
__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS and __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS are a workaround to
allow C++ programs to use stdint.h macros specified in the C99
standard that aren't in the C++ standard.
Likewise, the -Wno-sign-compare probably should be added to all files
for GCC <=4.6, but in fact we don't support anymore GCC 4.6 so it can go
away.
Paolo
