On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 08:53, David Engraf <david.eng...@sysgo.com> wrote:
>
> Using the whole 128 MiB flash in non-secure mode is not working because
> virt_flash_fdt() expects the same address for secure_sysmem and sysmem.
> This is not correctly handled by caller because it forwards NULL for
> secure_sysmem in non-secure flash mode.
>
> Fixed by using sysmem when secure_sysmem is NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Engraf <david.eng...@sysgo.com>

Nice catch; applied to target-arm.next for 4.1.

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to