On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 08:53, David Engraf <david.eng...@sysgo.com> wrote: > > Using the whole 128 MiB flash in non-secure mode is not working because > virt_flash_fdt() expects the same address for secure_sysmem and sysmem. > This is not correctly handled by caller because it forwards NULL for > secure_sysmem in non-secure flash mode. > > Fixed by using sysmem when secure_sysmem is NULL. > > Signed-off-by: David Engraf <david.eng...@sysgo.com>
Nice catch; applied to target-arm.next for 4.1. thanks -- PMM