Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> writes: > On 7/9/19 1:34 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Your subject matches the one git-revert creates (good), but you don't > > I was wondering whether rewrite it as "Restore 32-bit I/O accesses", > keeping the original subject is better?
I recommend to start with git-revert, resolve the conflicts if any, and append appropriate detail (rationale!) to git-revert's commit message. That way, people immediately see it's a revert, and of what. [...]
