On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 01:22:07PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:10:40PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > >> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> > >> Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelb...@gmail.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> > >> --- > >> MAINTAINERS | 16 ++++------------ > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> > > > >> > >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > >> index 1aef0afaf7..f18fddbbbb 100644 > >> --- a/MAINTAINERS > >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS > >> @@ -1268,8 +1268,12 @@ S: Supported > >> F: hw/core/machine.c > >> F: hw/core/null-machine.c > >> F: hw/cpu/cluster.c > >> +F: numa.c > >> +F: qom/cpu.c > > > > Not a blocker for this patch, but as a later patch, I'd encourage you to > > move qom/cpu.c somewhere else. Pretty much anywhere else would be better > > than under qom/ IMHO :-) > > Eduardo, any ideas?
Sorry for the late reply. I suggest hw/core/cpu.c. -- Eduardo
