On 03/07/2019 16:23, Amit Shah wrote: > On Tue, 2019-07-02 at 18:48 +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> On 02/07/2019 15:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 04:31:02PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>>> Add a new RNG backend using QEMU builtin getrandom function. >>>> >>>> v7: rebase on master >>>> Make rng-builtin asynchronous with QEMUBH (removed existing >>>> R-b) >>>> >>>> v6: remove "sysemu/rng-random.h" from virtio-rng.c >>>> rebase on qemu_getrandom v8 >>>> >>>> v5: PATCH 1 s/linux/Linux/ >>>> remove superfluous includes from rng-builtin.c >>>> don't update rng-random documentation >>>> add a patch from Markus to keep the default backend out of >>>> VirtIORNGConf >>>> move TYPE_RNG_BUILTIN to sysemu/rng.h and remove sysemu/rng- >>>> builtin.h >>>> >>>> v4: update PATCH 1 commit message >>>> >>>> v3: Include Kashyap's patch in the series >>>> Add a patch to change virtio-rng default backend to rng- >>>> builtin >>>> >>>> v2: Update qemu-options.hx >>>> describe the new backend and specify virtio-rng uses the >>>> rng-random by default >>> >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> >>> >>> feel free to merge. >> >> Thank you Michael. >> >> I've already included PATCH 1 in a pull-request for trivial patches >> branch. >> >> I'm not sure the other patches are good candidates for trivial >> patches >> branch, but is there any other maintainer that can include them in a >> pull request (before the freeze)? >> >> Amit? >> [Do you want I manage a virtio-rng pull-request for you?] > > Hello Laurent, > > Apologies as I haven't been around for a bit.
No problem. > I don't mind you doing the pull req yourself if you have sufficient > reviews. I think it's too late to push this in 4.1., so it this will wait next release. > Do you also want to consider maintaining rng yourself? It's up to you: if you think you don't have time to maintain virtio-rng, I can manage this. Thanks, Laurent
