On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote: > On 04/29/2011 01:53 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: >>> + CPU_INTERRUPT_TIMER | >> >> Grepping for CPU_INTERRUPT_TIMER shows that the flag isn't ever set, >> only cleared or checked. How >> about removing the flag instead? > > Certainly Sparc and MIPS shouldn't check it if they don't set it.
It's not used by any architecture now. > For Alpha, I do want to easily discriminate between device, timer, > and inter-processor interrupts. I'm currently (ab)using the i386 > CPU_INTERRUPT_SMI name for the IPI; I could abuse, say, FIQ for > my timer bit, but it seems nicer to simply keep the TIMER name. Since Alpha would be the first user, you can even rename it if you like.
