From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.z...@intel.com>
IOMMUNotifier is with inclusive ranges, so we should check
against (VTD_ADDRESS_SIZE(s->aw_bits) - 1).
Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.z...@intel.com>
[peterx: split from another bigger patch]
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
---
hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
index 44b1231157..719ce19ab3 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
@@ -3379,12 +3379,12 @@ static void vtd_address_space_unmap(VTDAddressSpace
*as, IOMMUNotifier *n)
* VT-d spec), otherwise we need to consider overflow of 64 bits.
*/
- if (end > VTD_ADDRESS_SIZE(s->aw_bits)) {
+ if (end > VTD_ADDRESS_SIZE(s->aw_bits) - 1) {
/*
* Don't need to unmap regions that is bigger than the whole
* VT-d supported address space size
*/
- end = VTD_ADDRESS_SIZE(s->aw_bits);
+ end = VTD_ADDRESS_SIZE(s->aw_bits) - 1;
}
assert(start <= end);
--
2.21.0
