On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 18:06, Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> From: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
>
> A galois field multiplication in field 2 is like binary multiplication,
> however instead of doing ordinary binary additions, xor's are performed.
> So no carries are considered.
>
> Implement all variants via helpers. s390_vec_sar() and s390_vec_shr()
> will be reused later on.
>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
Hi -- Coverity (CID 1401703) complains that a lot of this
function is dead code:
> +static S390Vector galois_multiply64(uint64_t a, uint64_t b)
> +{
> + S390Vector res = {};
> + S390Vector va = {
> + .doubleword[1] = a,
> + };
> + S390Vector vb = {
> + .doubleword[1] = b,
> + };
> +
> + while (!s390_vec_is_zero(&vb)) {
> + if (vb.doubleword[1] & 0x1) {
> + s390_vec_xor(&res, &res, &va);
> + }
> + s390_vec_shl(&va, &va, 1);
> + s390_vec_shr(&vb, &vb, 1);
> + }
> + return res;
> +}
but I can't make any sense of its annotations or why it
thinks this is true. Would somebody like to have a look at the
issue? If it's just Coverity getting confused we can mark it
as a false positive.
thanks
-- PMM
