On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 12:03:50PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 27/05/19 10:00, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > As long as we don't have an active QOM maintainer[*], the benefit is > > low. > > > > > > [*] We need one. I'm not volunteering. > > I think Daniel, Eduardo and I could count as de facto maintainer. I > guess I could maintain it if I get two partners in crime as reviewers.
Well, I guess this is just what we have been already doing becoming official. You can count me in. -- Eduardo
