On 28.05.19 14:55, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 5/24/19 4:33 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> +    /* identify the smaller element */
>> +    if (first_inequal < 16) {
>> +        uint8_t enr = first_inequal / (1 << es);
>> +        uint32_t a = s390_vec_read_element(v2, enr, es);
>> +        uint32_t b = s390_vec_read_element(v3, enr, es);
>> +
>> +        smaller = a < b;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (zs) {
>> +        z0 = zero_search(a0, mask);
>> +        z1 = zero_search(a1, mask);
>> +        first_zero = match_index(z0, z1);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    s390_vec_write_element64(v1, 0, MIN(first_inequal, first_zero));
>> +    s390_vec_write_element64(v1, 1, 0);
>> +    if (first_zero == 16 && first_inequal == 16) {
>> +        return 3;
>> +    } else if (first_zero < first_inequal) {
>> +        return 0;
>> +    }
>> +    return smaller ? 1 : 2;
> 
> Perhaps move the computation of smaller down here where it is used.

Wanted to do that but then I realized that I would have to move
s390_vec_write_element64() as well, because v1 and v2/v3 could overlap.

Thanks!

> 
> Otherwise,
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
> 
> 
> r~
> 


-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Reply via email to