On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 22:43, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Another intent to salvage previous work from Guenter Roeck: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-10/msg06302.html > > Since v3: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-10/msg06674.html > - rebased > - QOM'ify the SoC code > > Since v2: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-10/msg06459.html > - rename init -> create > - create controllers in SoC rather than the board (Peter Maydell) > - add Linux dtsi in commit message > > Since v1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-10/msg06335.html > - Do not factor out pl330_init, which resulted in buggy v1, see: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-10/msg06448.html > > Guenter Roeck (1): > hw/arm/exynos4210: Add DMA support for the Exynos4210 > > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (3): > hw/arm/exynos4: Remove unuseful debug code > hw/arm/exynos4: Use the IEC binary prefix definitions > hw/arm/exynos4210: QOM'ify the Exynos4210 SoC
Applied to target-arm.next, thanks. -- PMM
