Hi Eduardo, On 5/7/19 6:34 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Hi, > > This series looks at Eduardo suggestions from [1] > and Thomas commit aff39be0ed97 to replace various > object_initialize + qdev_set_parent_bus calls by > sysbus_init_child_obj().
Do you think you can take this series? Else, via which tree it should go? Thanks! Phil. > > Important comment from Eduardo: > > It's possible, but we need a volunteer to review each > hunk because the existing code might be (correctly) > calling object_unref() (either immediately or when > parent is finalized). > > I tried to split it enough to make the review process > easier. > > Regards, > > Phil. > > [*] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/943333/#1953608 > v1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-02/msg05931.html > > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (16): > hw/ppc/pnv: Use object_initialize_child for correct reference counting > hw/misc/macio: Use object_initialize_child for correct ref. counting > hw/virtio: Use object_initialize_child for correct reference counting > hw/arm/bcm2835: Use TYPE_PL011 instead of hardcoded string > hw/arm/bcm2835: Use object_initialize() on PL011State > hw/arm/bcm2835: Use object_initialize_child for correct ref. counting > hw/arm/aspeed: Use object_initialize_child for correct ref. counting > hw/arm: Use object_initialize_child for correct reference counting > hw/mips: Use object_initialize() on MIPSCPSState > hw/mips: Use object_initialize_child for correct reference counting > hw/microblaze/zynqmp: Move the IPI state into the PMUSoC state > hw/microblaze/zynqmp: Let the SoC manage the IPI devices > hw/microblaze/zynqmp: Use object_initialize_child for correct ref. > counting > hw/microblaze/zynqmp: Use object_initialize_child for correct ref. > counting > hw/arm/mps2: Use object_initialize_child for correct reference > counting > hw/intc/nvic: Use object_initialize_child for correct reference > counting
