On 18.04.2011, at 15:36, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:21:54PM +0200, Jan-Simon Möller wrote: >> Am Montag, 18. April 2011, 14:19:26 schrieb Riku Voipio: >>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 02:06:02PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>>> The patch looks OK, but I'd like to have a try with some s390x static >>>>> binaries. Such binaries are also useful for me to test that new patches >>>>> for linxu-user don't break targets I don't usually use. >>>> >>>> Sure - what exactly would you like there? I can easily compile a few. Do >>>> you want to have them added to the tests/ directory? >>> >>> busybox has so far been most useful. >>> >> >> Good idea, what about adding a collection of static busybox for the >> different >> arches? Not everyone testing has the compiler around for $ARCH . >> > > It's something that already exists [1]. It would actually make sense to > add s390x binaries there. Also it might be a good idea to provide a > minimal system image as on other architectures. > > [1] http://wiki.qemu.org/Download
I find the minimal systems rather useless, but love your Debian images. So if you could create one of those for s390, that'd be awesome! :) Alex
