From: Nikita Alekseev <n.alekseev2...@gmail.com>
bdrv_check_co_entry calls bdrv_co_check, which is a coroutine function.
Thus, it also needs to be marked as a coroutine.
Signed-off-by: Nikita Alekseev <n.alekseev2...@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20190401093051.16488-1-n.alekseev2...@gmail.com
Message-Id: <20190401093051.16488-1-n.alekseev2...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
---
block.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index 7dc8fe289a..5c2c6aa761 100644
--- a/block.c
+++ b/block.c
@@ -4121,7 +4121,7 @@ typedef struct CheckCo {
int ret;
} CheckCo;
-static void bdrv_check_co_entry(void *opaque)
+static void coroutine_fn bdrv_check_co_entry(void *opaque)
{
CheckCo *cco = opaque;
cco->ret = bdrv_co_check(cco->bs, cco->res, cco->fix);
--
2.21.0
