On 06/05/2019 09.48, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 08:18:54AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: >> Fixes might still get picked up via the qemu-block mailing list, >> so the status is not "Orphan" yet. >> Also add the gluster mailing list as suggested by Niels here: >> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10613297/#22409943 >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 5 +++-- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> index 66ddbda9c9..899a4cd572 100644 >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> @@ -2404,12 +2404,13 @@ F: block/ssh.c >> >> CURL >> L: qemu-bl...@nongnu.org >> -S: Supported >> +S: Odd Fixes >> F: block/curl.c >> >> GLUSTER >> L: qemu-bl...@nongnu.org >> -S: Supported >> +L: integrat...@gluster.org >> +S: Odd Fixes >> F: block/gluster.c > > I'm currently trying to get more experience on Gluster (and also on RBD). > I'd add myself as a reviewer since I'm trying to review all patches in these > areas and I'm working on some fixes. > I could also become a maintainer, but I'm not sure I have the right experience > you want. > > Should I send a new patch to add myself as reviewer (or maintainer)?
Yes, I think it's best if you send a separate patch for this, so that it also has a proper "Signed-off-by" line in the changelog history later. Thomas
