On 07/05/2019 10:48, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Fix a typo in xvxsigdp where we put both results into the lower
> doubleword.
>
> Fixes: dd977e4f45cb ("target/ppc: Optimize x[sv]xsigdp using deposit_i64()")
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <an...@ozlabs.org>
> ---
> target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.inc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.inc.c
> b/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.inc.c
> index 11d9b75d01..4d8ca7cf32 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.inc.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.inc.c
> @@ -1820,7 +1820,7 @@ static void gen_xvxsigdp(DisasContext *ctx)
> tcg_gen_movi_i64(t0, 0x0010000000000000);
> tcg_gen_movcond_i64(TCG_COND_EQ, t0, exp, zr, zr, t0);
> tcg_gen_movcond_i64(TCG_COND_EQ, t0, exp, nan, zr, t0);
> - tcg_gen_deposit_i64(xth, t0, xbl, 0, 52);
> + tcg_gen_deposit_i64(xtl, t0, xbl, 0, 52);
Out of curiosity - how did you find this one and (especially) the next
one - "Fix xxspltib"? Is there some testsuite, or by just looking at the
code? Thanks,
> set_cpu_vsrl(xT(ctx->opcode), xtl);
>
> tcg_temp_free_i64(t0);
>
--
Alexey
