On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:58:55AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Hm, this is an RFC patch, which suggests that it wasn't originally meant > to be merged as it is. Are you going to send a new version, or did it > turn out to be exactly what we want and the "RFC" tag was a mistake?
I put the "RFC" tag because I was not sure about this patch, but after your comments and some tests on the rbd_resize() impact, I think that it turns out exactly what we want. If you agree, you can queue it as is. Thanks, Stefano
