On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 08:06:13PM +0800, Pu Wen wrote: > Add a new base CPU model called 'Dhyana' to model processors from Hygon > Dhyana(family 18h), which derived from AMD EPYC(family 17h). > > The following features bits have been removed compare to AMD EPYC: > aes, pclmulqdq, sha_ni > > The Hygon Dhyana support to KVM in Linux is already accepted upstream[1]. > So add Hygon Dhyana support to Qemu is necessary to create Hygon's own > CPU model.
I have once question that we will have to solve for EPYC CPUs as well. The name should not be based on the Product name or Model name as that usually doesn't change with introduction of new microarchitecture. With EPYC we made a mistake to name the CPU like that, luckily with Intel we already use the microarchitecture name, so the EPYC CPU should have been named ZEN-Server and for Ryzen CPUs there should be ZEN-Client if there is any difference or otherwise we can simply use ZEN. The issue here is what happens once the ZEN2 microarchitecture is out wihch introduces new features and we will have to come up with a CPU name. Obviously we cannot change/remove the EPYC models so the question is what is the difference between the AMD EPYC CPU and this new Dhyana CPU if they are both based on the ZEN microarchitecture? In addition is there any way how we can introduce ZEN-Server & ZEN-Client or simply ZEN, if there is no difference, as an alias or a new model next to the EPYC? Pavel
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
