On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:55:09AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 05.04.2011, at 06:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 04:32:24PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> With the s390x target we use the deposit instruction to store 32bit values
> >> into 64bit registers without clobbering the upper 32 bits.
> >>
> >> This specific operation can be optimized slightly by using the ext
> >> operation
> >> instead of an explicit and in the deposit instruction. This patch adds that
> >> special case to the generic deposit implementation.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>
> >> ---
> >> tcg/tcg-op.h | 6 +++++-
> >> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > Have you really measuring a difference here? This should already be
> > handled, at least on x86, by this code:
> >
> > if (TCG_TARGET_REG_BITS == 64) {
> > if (val == 0xffffffffu) {
> > tcg_out_ext32u(s, r0, r0);
> > return;
> > }
> > if (val == (uint32_t)val) {
> > /* AND with no high bits set can use a 32-bit operation. */
> > rexw = 0;
> > }
> > }
>
> I've certainly looked at the -d op logs and seen that instead of creating a
> const tcg variable plus an AND there was now an extu opcode issued, yes. No
> idea why the case up there didn't trigger.
>
The question there is looking at -d out_asm. They should be the same at
the end as the code I pasted above is from tcg/i386/tcg-target.c.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
