On 05/04/2019 00.12, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> This patch is purely cosmetic. No functional change.
> This will ease the next patch where we re-indent an if() statement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/isa/isa-superio.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/isa/isa-superio.c b/hw/isa/isa-superio.c
> index d54463bf035..c6845eaf578 100644
> --- a/hw/isa/isa-superio.c
> +++ b/hw/isa/isa-superio.c
> @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@
>
> static void isa_superio_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> {
> - ISASuperIODevice *sio = ISA_SUPERIO(dev);
> - ISASuperIOClass *k = ISA_SUPERIO_GET_CLASS(sio);
> + ISASuperIODevice *s = ISA_SUPERIO(dev);
> + ISASuperIOClass *k = ISA_SUPERIO_GET_CLASS(s);
Sorry, but I have to say that I normally really don't like single-letter
variable names. They are much harder to search for, and way less
self-describing.
If you get problems with the line length in a later patch, what about
refactoring the related code into a separate function? So that you'd
only have something like this in the realize function:
for (i = 0, j = 0; i < bus_count; i++, j += MAX_IDE_DEVS) {
if (!k->ide.is_enabled || k->ide.is_enabled(s, j)) {
isa_superio_init_ide(...);
}
}
Thomas
