On 3/25/19 6:04 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 16/03/2019 23.39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> This fixes when configuring with --without-default-devices:
>>
>>   $ qemu-system-mips64el -M fulong2e --nodefaults -bios /dev/null
>>   qemu-system-mips64el: Unknown device 'ati-vga' for bus 'PCI'
>>   Aborted (core dumped)
>>
>>   (gdb) bt
>>   #1  0x00007ffff5a11895 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
>>   #2  0x00005555558768d3 in qdev_create (bus=bus@entry=0x5555562664b0, 
>> name=name@entry=0x555555b24efb "ati-vga") at hw/core/qdev.c:131
>>   #3  0x00005555558d15e1 in pci_create_multifunction 
>> (bus=bus@entry=0x5555562664b0, devfn=devfn@entry=-1, 
>> multifunction=multifunction@entry=false, name=name@entry=0x555555b24efb 
>> "ati-vga") at hw/pci/pci.c:2104
>>   #4  0x00005555558d1a7a in pci_create (bus=bus@entry=0x5555562664b0, 
>> devfn=devfn@entry=-1, name=name@entry=0x555555b24efb "ati-vga") at 
>> hw/pci/pci.c:2121
>>   #5  0x0000555555763081 in mips_fulong2e_init (machine=<optimized out>) at 
>> hw/mips/mips_fulong2e.c:352
>>   #6  0x000055555587e23b in machine_run_board_init (machine=0x5555560b2000) 
>> at hw/core/machine.c:1030
>>
>> Fixes: 862b4a291dc
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  default-configs/mips64el-softmmu.mak | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/default-configs/mips64el-softmmu.mak 
>> b/default-configs/mips64el-softmmu.mak
>> index 8b255efc54..a67c9517a2 100644
>> --- a/default-configs/mips64el-softmmu.mak
>> +++ b/default-configs/mips64el-softmmu.mak
>> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ CONFIG_RC4030=y
>>  CONFIG_DP8393X=y
>>  CONFIG_DS1225Y=y
>>  CONFIG_FULONG=y
>> +CONFIG_ATI_VGA=y
>> +CONFIG_RTL8139_PCI=y
> 
> You should mention RTL8139_PCI in the patch description, too. Also, does

Oops I missed that when squashing from v1 (Thanks Paolo for fixing it!).

> it make sense to fix this while your other Kconfig-for-mips patches have
> not been merged yet? (I don't expect --without-default-devices working
> without those patches)

Well this was breaking 'make check-unit'.

> 
>  Thomas
> 

Reply via email to