On Samstag, 30. März 2019 17:47:51 CET Greg Kurz wrote: > Maybe have a look at this tentative to fix QID collisions: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-02/msg02283.html
Interesting! My idea would have been different, based on my presumption that the amount of devices on a 9p exported tree should be very small, whereas the amount of total files/dirs could be very high, I would have probably encoded as many bits as possible for the inode part and would have consecutively generated short device IDs as prefixes instead. But I see that you already have a consensus to go into the direction suggested by Antonios. Question: so far I just had a look at that patch set, but haven't tried it yet. Am I correct that the inode numbers (of the same file) would actually change on guest side with every reboot (i.e. depending on the precise sequence individual files would be accessed by guest after each reboot)? Is there still anything substantial missing in that patch set? Best regards, Christian Schoenebeck
