On 27/03/2019 14.34, Ernest Esene wrote: > Set category and describe the i82374 device > > Signed-off-by: Ernest Esene <erok...@gmail.com> > > --- > v2: > * split into separate patches > --- > hw/dma/i82374.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/dma/i82374.c b/hw/dma/i82374.c > index 892f655a7e..5b42dd1bd4 100644 > --- a/hw/dma/i82374.c > +++ b/hw/dma/i82374.c > @@ -147,6 +147,8 @@ static void i82374_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void > *data) > dc->realize = i82374_realize; > dc->vmsd = &vmstate_i82374; > dc->props = i82374_properties; > + dc->desc = "Intel Enhanced DMA controller"; > + set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_BRIDGE, dc->categories); > }
Not sure if CATEGORY_BRIDGE is really the right thing for a dma controller ... maybe better put it into CATEGORY_MISC ? Thomas PS: By the way, does somebody know whether this device should be user_creatable at all? ... what is the use-case for exposing a DMA controller to the user?
