On 03/21/19 23:32, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Cool, so let me try this. I'm going to download the xz.old file
> manually. Rename it to just xz. It will then match the built-in
> checksum, and will be used as a cached copy. Then I will try building my
> series in *that* ("old") VM.Summary: (1) The image file at <http://download.patchew.org/openbsd-6.1-amd64.img.xz> has been recently uploaded ("Last-Modified: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:48:18 GMT") by someone unknown to me, and its sha256sum doesn't match the sha256sum in the "tests/vm/openbsd" test script. This is why my earlier attempts at the OpenBSD build test have failed. And in fact I don't understand how it could work for anyone else -- the compiler that the "tests/vm/openbsd" script specifies is neither installed, nor available with "pkg_add", in this image. (2) Against the "old" image <http://download.patchew.org/openbsd-6.1-amd64.img.xz.old>, which indeed has the expected sha256sum=8c6cedc483e602cfee5e04f0406c64eb99138495e8ca580bc0293bcf0640c1bf, the build test *does* succeed. ( In order to make use of the old image, it has to be downloaded manually, then moved/renamed to: $HOME/.cache/qemu-vm/download/bc4733f6c6e76931702528a515a1bf70eb8baecd because the last filename component must be the sha1sum of the URL itself, for the caching mechanism to recognize the compressed image: > $ echo -n 'http://download.patchew.org/openbsd-6.1-amd64.img.xz' \ > | sha1sum > bc4733f6c6e76931702528a515a1bf70eb8baecd - ) I'm attaching the log of the successful OpenBSD build test, which I captured with "screen" (see the "BUNZIP2" lines in it, in particular). Thanks, Laszlo
screen.log.xz
Description: application/xz
