On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 11:45, Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@sifive.com> wrote: > This is another one that got queued up behind the decode tree stuff. I'd call > this a new feature, but give that it's been on the list and reviewed I'm not > sure if it's OK for master right now. > > Peter: is this too much of a change for post-rc0? If possible I'd like it in, > as it's pretty self-contained and enables a meaningful use case.
Yes, I think it's ok to go in. (If you send a pullreq for it in the next 3 hours or so then it'll actually get in before rc0 ;-)) -- PMM
