On 18.3.19. 20:08, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
From: Mateja Marjanovic <mateja.marjano...@rt-rk.com>
Subject: [PATCH] target/mips: Fix minor bug in FPU
From: Mateja Marjanovic <mateja.marjano...@rt-rk.com>
Wrong type of NaN was generated for IEEE754-2008 by maddf and
msubf insturctions when the arguments were inf, zero, nan or
zero, inf, nan respectively.
"insturctions" -> "instructions".
Typo, I will correct that.
The word "respectively" is here wrong and spurious.
The meaning that you convey with the current wording is that
the "inf, zero, nan" case is related to "maddf" (only), and the
"zero, inf, nan" to "msubf".
Could you tell me what do you suggest?
Does "Wrong type of NaN was generated for IEEE754-2008 by maddf and msubf
insturctions when the arguments were (inf, zero, nan) or
(zero, inf, nan)." seem ok?
Please use full instruction names with possible Backus-Naur
shorthands, like "MADDF.<D|S>", "MSUBF.<D|S>".
Ok, I will use that from now on.
Thanks,
Aleksandar
Thanks,
Mateja
