On 14/03/19 13:16, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Mmm, that makes sense. So in this particular case, do we
> want to try to avoid doing an unbounded allocation based
> on whatever rubbish the user passed us in the environment,
> or do we say "this particular case is OK" and mark it
> as a false-positive ?
> 
> Cc'ing Gerd since the Coverity issues in question are
> in the audio code (in get_str() and in
> audio_handle_legacy_opts()).

I think the solution for that is deprecating the old legacy options and
getting rid of them in one year...

Paolo

Reply via email to