On 3/13/19 3:46 AM, Kamal Heib wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kamal Heib <kamalhe...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  hw/rdma/rdma_backend.c      | 18 +++++++++---------
>  hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_cmd.c    |  2 +-
>  hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_qp_ops.c |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

{0} is standard C (but some versions of clang have a bug that it
mistakenly warns for certain structs); {} is an extension (but one that
both gcc and clang support).  Did you hit the actual clang bug that
requires this change, or are you only doing it for consistency?

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to