On 04/05/2011 02:24 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora
<ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
The nwnames field in TWALK message is assumed to be>=0 and<= MAXWELEM
which is defined as macro P9_MAXWELEM (16) in virtio-9p.h as per 9p2000
RFC. Appropriate changes are required in V9fsWalkState and v9fs_walk.
v3:
- Updated if-else conditions to appropriately handle nwnames = 0.
v2:
- Added check in v9fs_walk_complete as well.
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora<ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
hw/9pfs/virtio-9p.c | 7 +++++--
hw/9pfs/virtio-9p.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
hw/virtio-9p.c
I think you've submitted a patch against an internal tree that isn't upstream.
Yes, it is based on a patch yet to be merged in mainline by Aneesh which
will move 9p files into a separate folder, however, I shall repost an
updated version of the patch based on current directory structure.
regards,
Harsh
Stefan
