Hi On 3/12/19 8:49 AM, Wei Yang wrote: > This is more proper to use PCIE_MMCFG_BUS to retrieve end_bus_number. > > Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.y...@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
Thanks Eric > --- > hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c > index d7e2e4885b..57679a89bf 100644 > --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c > +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c > @@ -560,8 +560,8 @@ build_mcfg(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, > VirtMachineState *vms) > /* Only a single allocation so no need to play with segments */ > mcfg->allocation[0].pci_segment = cpu_to_le16(0); > mcfg->allocation[0].start_bus_number = 0; > - mcfg->allocation[0].end_bus_number = (memmap[ecam_id].size > - / PCIE_MMCFG_SIZE_MIN) - 1; > + mcfg->allocation[0].end_bus_number = > + PCIE_MMCFG_BUS(memmap[ecam_id].size - 1); > > build_header(linker, table_data, (void *)(table_data->data + mcfg_start), > "MCFG", table_data->len - mcfg_start, 1, NULL, NULL); >