Hi On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 1:35 PM Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com> wrote: > > Hi. > > I'm trying to figure out the state of this patch set. > Is there any chance for it to be accepted? > > The first patch needs minor rebase. I could send a new version.
Please do, I prefer the solution proposed in v2: do not register hostmem-memfd if sealing isn't supported (keep sealing=true the default - it's one of the main purpose of memfd imho). Daniel, Eduardo: are you ok with this series for 4.0? > > BTW, even without the first patch that raised some discussion > the last three patches are kind of straightforward and useful. > > Best regards, Ilya Maximets. > > On 27.11.2018 16:50, Ilya Maximets wrote: > > Version 2: > > * First patch changed to just drop the memfd backend > > if seals are not supported. > > > > Ilya Maximets (4): > > hostmem-memfd: disable for systems wihtout sealing support > > memfd: always check for MFD_CLOEXEC > > memfd: set up correct errno if not supported > > memfd: improve error messages > > > > backends/hostmem-memfd.c | 18 ++++++++---------- > > tests/vhost-user-test.c | 6 +++--- > > util/memfd.c | 10 ++++++++-- > > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > -- Marc-André Lureau
