On 08/03/19 18:55, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 11:30, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 19/02/19 22:19, Viktor Prutyanov wrote:
>>> Before this patch, if elf2dmp failed to find NT kernel PE magic in
>>> allowed virtual address range, then it assumes NULL as NT kernel
>>> address and cause segfault.
>>>
>>> This patch fix the problem described above by checking NT kernel address
>>> before futher processing.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Viktor Prutyanov <viktor.prutya...@phystech.edu>
>>> ---
>>>  contrib/elf2dmp/main.c | 6 ++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/contrib/elf2dmp/main.c b/contrib/elf2dmp/main.c
>>> index 1a45eaf565..1bfeb89ba7 100644
>>> --- a/contrib/elf2dmp/main.c
>>> +++ b/contrib/elf2dmp/main.c
>>> @@ -524,6 +524,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>>          }
>>>      }
>>>
>>> +    if (!nt_start_addr) {
>>> +        eprintf("Failed to find NT kernel image\n");
>>> +        err = 1;
>>> +        goto out_ps;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>>      printf("KernBase = 0x%016"PRIx64", signature is \'%.2s\'\n", KernBase,
>>>              (char *)nt_start_addr);
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Queued, thanks.
> 
> Hi Paolo -- I noticed this fix wasn't in master yet -- is it in
> a tree you're planning on sending a pullreq for soon?

Yep, I just wanted to flush kconfig and qgraph before everybody starts
sending pull requests for soft freeze.

Paolo


Reply via email to