On 08/03/19 18:55, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 11:30, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 19/02/19 22:19, Viktor Prutyanov wrote: >>> Before this patch, if elf2dmp failed to find NT kernel PE magic in >>> allowed virtual address range, then it assumes NULL as NT kernel >>> address and cause segfault. >>> >>> This patch fix the problem described above by checking NT kernel address >>> before futher processing. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Viktor Prutyanov <viktor.prutya...@phystech.edu> >>> --- >>> contrib/elf2dmp/main.c | 6 ++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/contrib/elf2dmp/main.c b/contrib/elf2dmp/main.c >>> index 1a45eaf565..1bfeb89ba7 100644 >>> --- a/contrib/elf2dmp/main.c >>> +++ b/contrib/elf2dmp/main.c >>> @@ -524,6 +524,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) >>> } >>> } >>> >>> + if (!nt_start_addr) { >>> + eprintf("Failed to find NT kernel image\n"); >>> + err = 1; >>> + goto out_ps; >>> + } >>> + >>> printf("KernBase = 0x%016"PRIx64", signature is \'%.2s\'\n", KernBase, >>> (char *)nt_start_addr); >>> >>> >> >> Queued, thanks. > > Hi Paolo -- I noticed this fix wasn't in master yet -- is it in > a tree you're planning on sending a pullreq for soon?
Yep, I just wanted to flush kconfig and qgraph before everybody starts sending pull requests for soft freeze. Paolo