On 27.02.19 16:36, no-re...@patchew.org wrote: > Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190221093459.22547-1-da...@redhat.com/ > > > > Hi, > > This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for > more information: > > Message-id: 20190221093459.22547-1-da...@redhat.com > Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] include/exec/helper-head.h: support "const > void *" in helper calls > Type: series > > === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === > #!/bin/bash > git rev-parse base > /dev/null || exit 0 > git config --local diff.renamelimit 0 > git config --local diff.renames True > git config --local diff.algorithm histogram > ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback base.. > === TEST SCRIPT END === > > Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384 > From https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu > * [new tag] patchew/20190221093459.22547-1-da...@redhat.com -> > patchew/20190221093459.22547-1-da...@redhat.com > * [new tag] > patchew/20190225012530.28225-1-richardw.y...@linux.intel.com -> > patchew/20190225012530.28225-1-richardw.y...@linux.intel.com > * [new tag] > patchew/20190225162325.24008-1-maxiw...@linux.ibm.com -> > patchew/20190225162325.24008-1-maxiw...@linux.ibm.com > Switched to a new branch 'test' > > === OUTPUT BEGIN === > checkpatch.pl: no revisions returned for revlist '1'
While patchew seems to be broken right now, I wonder why patches are tested that are long upstream? Is this some leftover from fixing patchew? -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
